The University of British Columbia
UBC - A Place of Mind
The University of British Columbia
Peter A. Allard School of LawINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 422
  • Course Stream
  • Issues/Your Take
  • Syllabus Spring 2026
    • Syllabus Spring 2026
    • Syllabus Fall 2025
    • Syllabus Spring 2025
    • Syllabus Fall 2024
    • Syllabus Spring 2024
    • Syllabus Fall 2023
    • Syllabus Spring 2023
    • Syllabus Fall 2022
    • Syllabus Spring 2022
    • Syllabus Fall 2021
    • Syllabus Spring 2021
    • Syllabus Spring 2020
  • Course Video & Notes
  • Statutes
  • Socrates A.I.
  • About
    • Thanks
    • Allan Switzer
    • Community/Participate
    • Graham’s Bio
    • Jon’s Bio
» Peter A. Allard School of Law » Home » 2025 » November » 26 » Modern Day Preston v Lucas

Modern Day Preston v Lucas

By admin on November 26, 2025

Quick throwback to Copyright law: while reviewing the class, specifically Preston v Lucas and Cinar v Robinson, I was reminded of headlines I saw earlier this year about a strikingly similar case.

In this case, Dave Franco and Allison Brie, along with a production company, are being sued over the horror movie “Together” by production company StudioFest, which claims that “Together” is a copy of their film “Better Half”. StudioFest registered their film with the USA Copyright Office in 2023 and allegedly sent their script to Franco and Brie’s agents to see if they would be interested in producing it, but their agents declined to participate in the film.

The similarities cited by StudioFest include the theme, as both movies focus on a couple being fused together, and more specific similarities, including the couples involving a teacher and an aspiring artist, both movies referencing Plato and allegedly a conversation about Plato’s symposium being copied nearly verbatim.

I have been wondering throughout the class how this case would be decided in Canada based on what we have learned. Based on Cinar v Robinson, this could potentially be copyright infringement if the features reproduced were a substantial part of StudioFest’s work. Given the general theme, the specifics of the couple (including their jobs and relationship dynamic), and some dialogue appear to be copied, there is evidence in support of there being infringement. However, Preston v Lucas, and the Dawn of the Dead video game example discussed in class (where the court found it is a core, inherent part of zombie stories to include people fleeing from the top of a mall in a helicopter), there is support to say the court would find that the court would find that Plato conversation in particular is needed for films relating to couples being fused and is in the general, public knowledge and not open to copyright.

Given this, I am interested to hear how you think the case would be decided in Canada and what other information you may need to come to your determination.

Source: https://millershah.com/blog/copyright-lawsuit-brie-franco/#:~:text=On%20May%2013%2C%202025%2C%20StudioFest,biggest%20deals%20in%20Sundance%20history

Read More | No Comments

  • Previous
  • Next

Copyright & Social Media
Communications Law


Top Commented

  • Another look at digital ownership: California district judge entertains lawsuit against Apple re iTunes “Buy” button
  • Lionel Ritchie sells homes?
  • How Trademarks Can Potentially Promote Sustainable Fashion
  • A Copyright of a Copyright
  • Video game copycats – where is the line drawn?
  • Featured

  • Patent Law Regime in Canada V/S United States


  • Tweets by jonfestinger


    Creative Commons License
    Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia
    1822 East Mall
    Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z1
    Tel 604 822 3151
    Fax 604 822 8108
    Website allard.ubc.ca
    Back to top
    The University of British Columbia
    • Emergency Procedures |
    • Terms of Use |
    • Copyright |
    • Accessibility